Contact Us

Assessment Insights

Where’s Statewide Testing Going?

[fa icon="calendar'] June, 2016 / by Dr. Stuart Kahl posted in Accountability, Interim Assessments

[fa icon="comment"] 0 Comments

The past 15 years have seen a lot of changes in statewide accountability testing. The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) increased federal control over state assessment programs and increased stakes associated with test results. The Obama administration’s Race to the Top program further raised the stakes by incentivizing the adoption of common college-readiness standards and assessments and the significant weighing of student test results in teacher evaluations.

Read More [fa icon="long-arrow-right"]

Online and Paper Testing: Are We Looking at the Differences Closely Enough?

[fa icon="calendar'] April, 2016 / by Chad Barrett posted in Classroom Assessment, Formative Assessment, Accountability, Interim Assessments

[fa icon="comment"] 0 Comments

Recently Parcc, Inc. reported student performance differences on the Spring 2015 PARCC® assessments based on the mode of testing: online or paper. Benjamin Herold summarized the findings in two recent Education Week articles. He reported that the pattern of lower student performance for those taking the computer-based tests was most pronounced in English Language Arts and middle- and high-school mathematics (Herold, 2016a). Parcc, Inc. has not yet released research evidence or announced a plan to conduct research that may explain the mode differences. Herold reported that Parcc, Inc. is asking participating states to examine the differences and draw conclusions appropriate for their context.

Read More [fa icon="long-arrow-right"]

New Possibilities for State Assessment under the ESSA

[fa icon="calendar'] February, 2016 / by Dr. Stuart Kahl posted in Accountability, Interim Assessments, Connecting Teaching and Learning

[fa icon="comment"] 0 Comments

The 1061 pages of the new Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) address a wide range of topics that educators and policy makers need to understand. In many ways, the law appears much the same as the previous ESEA reauthorization, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). The requirements for common, challenging academic standards and for common assessments in certain grades and subjects remain the same. So do the requirements for standards and assessments for students with disabilities and English language learners. Within those pages, though, are noteworthy changes in the law relating to statewide accountability assessment.

Read More [fa icon="long-arrow-right"]